Ressource

  • ZONES HUMIDES, BIODIVERSITEEditerSupprimer

    Quantifying welfare gains of coastal and estuarine ecosystem rehabilitation for recreational fisheries2019

    ( et alii ), CARNELL P., CONRON S., HUANG B., YOUNG M.A.Journaux et Revues (scientifiques)

    analyse conjointe / dichotomique, biens et services écosystémiques, coûts/ mesures de restauration, évaluation contingente, pêche / chasse, valeurs récréatives ou d'agrément

    Science of The Total Environment
    Available online 23 November 2019, 134680

    Highlights
    • Welfare gain across locations varied due to heterogeneous coverage of seagrass.

    • The benefits ranged from near-zero to AU $19.2 for 10% habitat increase scenario.

    • The annual benefit could be up to AU $6.2 million for this 10% increase scenario.

    • The benefits ranged from near-zero to AU $85.5 for 30% habitat increase scenario.

    • The annual benefit could be up to AU $22 million for this 30% increase scenario.


    Abstract
    Coastal and estuarine ecosystems, such as mangroves, tidal marshes and seagrass meadows, provide a range of ecosystem services, but have seen extensive degradation and decline. Effective protection and rehabilitation of coastal ecosystems requires an understanding of how efforts may improve associated ecosystem services. In this study, we present a spatially-explicit angler catch function to predict boat-based recreational catch as a function of ecosystem and angler characteristics. We developed a choice model to investigate where recreational anglers launch their boats and fish in southeast Australia. By linking the recreational catch models with a choice model, we were able to quantify welfare gains of ecosystem rehabilitation. We found welfare gains across fishing locations varied widely due to heterogeneous coverage of seagrass. The welfare gains of different fishing locations ranged from near-zero in areas of low seagrass coverage, to AU $19.18 (10% increase in seagrass area) and to AU $85.55 (30% increase) per trip in location of high seagrass coverage. Given two million fishing trips occurring per year in Port Phillip Bay, and one million in Western Port, the aggregated welfare gain could scale up to AU $6.2 million with a 10% increase in seagrass coverage, and AU $22 million per annum with a 30% increase in seagrass. We also calculated the welfare loss associated with total loss of seagrass ecosystem in each fishing location to represent the current value, which varied significantly, ranging from near-zero in some locations to AU $87.47 per trip in other location. Over the past several decades, the bay-wide seagrass ecosystem has dropped by 36.7% in Western Port, resulting in potential welfare loss of an estimated AU $ 86.7 million per annum. Our analyses provide insightful spatial policy implications for coastal and marine ecosystem rehabilitation in the region.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134680

  • Retour